The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on August 13, 2026 that President Trump can continue to suspend the “de minimis” tariff exemption for low-value imported packages, rejecting a legal challenge and leaving in place a policy that has already reshaped how small parcels enter the country.
De minimis previously let packages valued at $800 or less enter the U.S. duty-free without formal customs processing, a rule fast-fashion and e-commerce platforms like Shein and Temu leaned on heavily to ship enormous volumes of low-cost goods directly to American consumers without tariffs attached. Trump moved to suspend the exemption first for China and Hong Kong, effective May 2, 2025, then expanded the suspension globally effective August 29, 2025, citing its use to evade tariffs and smuggle fentanyl and counterfeit goods into the country.
The Legal Challenge
Auto-parts retailer Detroit Axle sued the Trump administration in May 2025, arguing the president lacked legal authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to unilaterally scrap a long-standing statutory exemption. The Justice Department countered that lifting a suspension on tariffs already in effect wasn't the same as imposing new ones outright — a distinction the court ultimately accepted in siding with the administration.
What's Actually Changed at the Border
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has been enforcing consistent duty collection across every mode of entry since the suspension took hold, indefinitely ending duty-free treatment for imports valued at $800 or less. Narrow carve-outs remain: personal letters, bona fide gifts under $100, and personal travel items under $200 are still exempt, according to CBP's own fact sheet on the policy. The financial impact has already been substantial — CBP says the suspension generated more than $1 billion in duty payments by the end of 2025 alone, with collections continuing to accumulate through 2026.
Related: Baltimore Sues Kalshi and Polymarket Over Unlicensed Sports Betting
Who Feels It Most
The ruling lands hardest on smaller importers and retailers with thin margins and little room to absorb new costs, in contrast to giants like Shein and Temu, which have had over a year to restructure logistics around bulk shipments and domestic warehousing rather than parcel-by-parcel duty-free imports. For now, the Court of International Trade's decision closes off the main legal avenue businesses had for challenging the suspension outright, leaving Congress — rather than the courts — as the only remaining path to reversing it.
