Gold futures broke above $4,500 an ounce for the first time since June 5, extending a rally that has now added 14% to the metal's price since July 17. The move keeps gold on pace for its biggest yearly gain since 1979, with the metal up more than 70% year-to-date.
The latest leg higher tracks closely with a weaker-than-expected US labor market. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that US payrolls fell by 23,000 in July, a sharp miss against Wall Street's roughly 83,000-job forecast, while the BLS also revised May and June's combined job gains down by a further 103,000. Weak labor data of that scale tends to reinforce bets on lower interest rates, which lift non-yielding assets like gold by reducing the opportunity cost of holding them instead of interest-bearing bonds or cash.
Central banks and ETF flows are doing the heavy lifting
Beyond the rate-cut narrative, the rally has been underpinned by robust central bank gold purchases and steady inflows into gold-backed exchange-traded funds, alongside strong retail demand for bars and coins. Trade-policy uncertainty tied to the Trump administration's tariff stance has added a further layer of hedging demand, pushing investors toward gold as a store of value independent of any single currency or government's fiscal position.
A hedge that has moved in tandem with bitcoin's own narrative
Gold's rally shares a common driver with the case crypto bulls have made for bitcoin this year: concern that persistent government deficit spending and an eventual return to lower rates will erode the purchasing power of cash and traditional bonds. Whether that parallel holds up in practice remains contested, since bitcoin and gold have diverged sharply in volatility and correlation to risk assets even when the macro narrative pointing to both is similar.
Related: Yen's Intervention-Fueled Rally Fades as USD/JPY Climbs Back to 159
With gold now sitting at a fresh multi-month high and inflation data still leaving the Fed's September decision genuinely uncertain, the metal's next move looks tied as much to how policymakers respond to a softening labor market as to inflation readings alone.
