Frustration with the Trump administration is building among five of Washington's key Gulf allies, according to Washington Post reporting that cites Arab and Western officials describing growing doubts in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain over the administration's handling of the conflict with Iran. One Gulf official put it bluntly: “Trump started this war, and we are paying the price.”
The core complaint centers on a pattern officials describe as erratic: the administration issuing threats against Iran, then pulling back while citing negotiating progress, without producing a durable peace. A June memorandum of understanding aimed at de-escalation reportedly left unresolved the two issues Gulf states see as most dangerous, Iran's ballistic missile program and its network of regional proxy forces.
Military bases now an open question
Qatar and Bahrain, which host large US military installations, are among the countries where officials are now debating whether continuing to host those bases still serves their interests, a striking shift for two governments long considered among Washington's most reliable regional hosts. The concern is not hypothetical: Gulf energy facilities and desalination plants have already been targeted in Iranian reprisals tied to the broader conflict, giving these governments a direct incentive to reassess the security trade-offs of close alignment with US operations.
The economic stakes extend beyond security. Saudi Arabia's Future Investment Initiative conference, the high-profile investment gathering often nicknamed “Davos in the Desert,” is scheduled for October, and its international participation is reportedly now in question amid the broader strain in relations.
Gulf states are hedging elsewhere
The frustration has coincided with Gulf states actively diversifying their security partnerships. On Aug. 7, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan signed the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, a mutual-defense pact under which an attack on any one signatory is treated as an attack on all three. Combined, the three countries field close to 1.4 million active military personnel, more than 3,400 aircraft and roughly 6,000 tanks, according to the 2026 Global Firepower Index, giving Riyadh a substantial alternative security umbrella that includes Pakistan's nuclear arsenal and Turkey's NATO membership.
Related: Top Oil Majors Post Record ~$70B in Free Cash Flow in Q2
None of this amounts to a formal break with Washington, and Gulf officials continue to describe their relationship with the US as strategically important. But the combination of an unresolved Iran conflict, open discussion of scaling back US basing arrangements, and a new regional defense pact signals that America's traditional Gulf partners are no longer treating US security guarantees as automatic, a shift with implications for oil markets, regional stability and US influence in the Middle East going forward.