Highlights

  • India will push BRICS members to expand central bank digital currency use for cross-border payments at the September 12-13 New Delhi summit.
  • New Delhi is stopping short of backing a unified BRICS payment settlement system that could be read as directly challenging the dollar.
  • India's central bank, the RBI, recommended adding a CBDC-connection proposal to the summit's agenda.
  • An agreement on a single bloc-wide payments system remains unlikely at this year's summit.

India's CBDC Push at the New Delhi Summit

India plans to use its chairmanship of the 18th BRICS Summit, set for September 12-13 in New Delhi, to push member states toward greater use of central bank digital currencies for settling cross-border trade. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government favors linking national CBDCs — such as India's digital rupee — to let BRICS members settle bilateral trade directly, bypassing dollar-denominated intermediaries. India's central bank, the Reserve Bank of India, had recommended that a proposal to connect member states' CBDCs be added to the summit agenda. Notably, India is expected to stop short of backing a single, unified BRICS-wide payment settlement system, an approach some members have floated as a more direct challenge to the dollar's role in global trade.

A Decade of BRICS De-Dollarization Attempts

The push fits a pattern that has built steadily since BRICS members began exploring alternatives to dollar-based settlement more than a decade ago. Talk of a shared payments infrastructure dates back to the bloc's earliest joint statements calling for a "more diversified international monetary system," but the effort gained real momentum after 2022, when a wave of Western sanctions on Russia pushed Moscow to openly champion de-dollarization and a rival payment network known as BRICS Pay. Russia used its own 2024 chairmanship to formally propose a BRICS Cross-Border Payment Initiative designed to link national CBDCs — India's digital rupee, China's digital yuan and Russia's digital ruble among them — through interoperable settlement cycles and foreign-exchange swap lines. China's own CBDC rollout has continued to expand independently of the BRICS effort: the People's Bank of China recently added eight more banks to its digital yuan network, bringing the total to 30 participating institutions. India's position at this year's summit effectively narrows the bloc's ambitions to what's achievable now — interoperable CBDC settlement between willing pairs of members — rather than the sweeping single-currency or single-network proposals Russia and China have floated in years past.

Why This Isn't a Dollar-Displacement Story

For crypto markets, a CBDC-focused BRICS framework lands differently than a shared BRICS currency would have. A common-currency proposal, however unlikely, has periodically stoked speculation that accelerating de-dollarization could lift demand for non-sovereign assets like bitcoin as a neutral reserve option. A narrower CBDC interoperability push is the opposite kind of story: it's state-issued digital money designed to work more efficiently within the existing system of national currencies, not around it, and it keeps each central bank in full control of its own monetary policy and capital controls. That distinction matters for how the announcement should be read — it's an incremental payments-infrastructure story, not a dollar-displacement one, and India's explicit rejection of a unified settlement network confirms the bloc remains far from any coordinated challenge to dollar dominance.

Related: ECB's Cipollone Says Digital Euro Privacy Will Beat Bank Transfers

The broader trend is nonetheless notable: central banks globally continue treating blockchain-style settlement rails as inevitable infrastructure regardless of where they land on de-dollarization. The European Central Bank's Isabel Schnabel has separately argued central bank money must move onto blockchain to stay relevant as private stablecoins and tokenized deposits proliferate, a view now echoed in India's own CBDC push within BRICS. For BRICS members like Russia, which has been building out its own domestic crypto framework alongside CBDC ambitions — Russia's new crypto trading law recently took effect with retail purchase caps — CBDC interoperability offers a state-sanctioned settlement channel that doesn't require loosening those domestic controls.

What to Watch at the Summit

The September 12-13 summit at New Delhi's Bharat Mandapam will show how much of India's CBDC framing other members are willing to accept without a unified network attached. Watch for whether the summit's final declaration includes concrete language on CBDC interoperability pilots between specific member pairs, which would mark tangible progress, versus vague aspirational language repeating past summits' commitments. China and Russia's appetite for reviving more ambitious common-currency or BRICS Pay proposals in future chairmanships also remains the wildcard — India's more cautious approach this year doesn't bind whoever chairs the bloc next. For now, the practical outcome to track is whether any bilateral CBDC settlement corridor between BRICS members moves from proposal to pilot before the bloc's next leadership rotation.

FAQ

What is India proposing for BRICS payments?
India wants BRICS members to expand the use of central bank digital currencies, such as its own digital rupee, to settle cross-border trade directly between member states.

Why won't India support a unified BRICS payment system?
New Delhi wants to avoid a network that could be seen as a direct, coordinated challenge to the dollar's role in global trade, favoring incremental bilateral CBDC links instead.

When is the BRICS summit taking place?
The 18th BRICS Summit is scheduled for September 12-13 at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, with India chairing the bloc for 2026.

Does this mean BRICS is close to a shared currency?
No — talk of a shared BRICS currency has circulated for years without a formal proposal, and India's CBDC-interoperability approach is a narrower, incremental step rather than a move toward one currency.